Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for March, 2008

This presidential election will be the first where online advertising will play a significant role in the results. Traditional TV ad’s still represent a disproportionally high amount of ad spend by the different candidates, however, more and more money is moving to the online medium.

Here is an interesting article on the subject in ClickZ by Elyse Tager: “Behavioral Targeting’s Role in Presidential Campaigns”.

The article speculates that Giuliani’s campaign failed partly by not having a strong online strategy (he was also the last to market with a TV campaign). He registered his domain name only in 2006, signaling a feeling that a Web presence was only obligatory, not a necessity. On the other hand, Obama’s online media campaign has been tremendously successful with more Technorati links and his (and McCain’s) participation in PPC (define) during this time, suggesting serious SEO efforts on his part.

This year Obama now has overtaken Clinton in every SEO category, while McCain lags far behind. What does this analysis mean if Obama and McCain go up against each other? Most likely that people who support Obama are more tech literate and get their news and information online. It suggests that McCain’s supporters are older and respond more to traditional media. This is what behavioral targeting can reveal.

The article also outlines ZeroDash1′s Anil Batra’s suggestions on how the Presidential Candidates could leverage Behavioral Targeting.

  • Retarget the site visitor as she navigates within the network.
  • Target the undecided voter with a persuasive message (ad).
  • Segment visitors by what they view on the site.
  • Use a convincing message to encourage visitors to make a campaign contribution.
  • Use the visitor’s offsite behavior to deliver a targeted message once she’s on your site.
  • Use IP geotargeting to identify and buy media in low-traffic geographic locations. Use geotargeting to segment visitors in high-traffic locations to fine-tune the site message.

This is a timely and interesting article and well worth the read for those interested.

Read Full Post »

While working at CSG Openline as the Vice President of Operations, one of my biggest challenges was to create a collaborative environment across the different delivery departments. Immediately, I had recognized that the teams relied too much on email communication and not enough on basic face-to-face resolutions of problems.

In order to facilitate better teamwork at the management level, I scheduled a weekly “High Tea” get together. Managers of the different delivery departments were required to dress up (coat or sweater with a tie for men, and professional attire for women) and attend High Tea together. I thought this was quite a civilized approach to improve our “conversations”. So, I brought in a tea set for the office and even coaxed my wife, on occasions, into making cucumber sandwiches and crumpets for us.

CSG Openline is a Channel Marketing company, mainly servicing call center campaigns to Microsoft partners. The delivery departments completely relied on one another to get their job done successfully. For example, the call center was dependent on IT to customize each campaign interface before it could launch a new program. IT, for its part, had multiple, and often conflicting requirements from the different project managers. Obviously, effective communication and cooperation amongst these groups were vital to the long-term success of the company.

At first, the employees found it humorous that their managers dressed up on “High Tea” day. After the jokes, however, people realized that management was taking better collaboration seriously. There was physical evidence of a commitment to change.

Within the management team, initial skepticism eventually gave way to addressing some deep-rooted trust issues amongst the groups. The managers began better understanding each other’s challenges and started working collectively together to resolve a few underlining problems. Over time, we all shared some of our personal lives as well, allowing everyone to understand each other at a more intimate level.

Although we continued to butt heads at times, general communication improved. Eventually, the “High Tea” conversations ran their course and we changed to a more conventional management meeting format. However, this experience did reinforce the idea that in our incredibly productive corporate world, sometimes we just need to breathe and be more human with one another. Email is an efficient method of communication, but at times it can be very ineffective or even counter-productive. Face-to-face resolutions of issues can be stressful, but often times can be the most effective way to work out issues for the long-term.

Last week, I met with a management consultant (readers of this blog will “MEET” him eventually) who helped CSG Openline. He reminded me about these “High Tea” meetings and explained how he appreciated the simplicity in the idea of getting a team to buy into each other and communicate more directly with one another. So, I decided to share.

Read Full Post »

MEET Brad Furber, a recovering “deal junkie”.

Those recovering deal junkies can be hard to spot. Brad looks calm, clean cut, not too stressed out. His round wire-frame glasses and deliberate manner of speaking give slight clues of his past career as a corporate and securities attorney. Otherwise, he looks like another internet entrepreneur. Listen to him talk about online marketing, and you’d think he was born to be an internet big wig. Sometimes, however, get him talking about his past deals and he’ll admit that he still craves the “adrenaline rush” of negotiating and closing big deals.

The truth of the matter is that if you were an entrepreneur in the Seattle area during the late 1990’s and early 2000s, you probably met Brad or heard him speak at one of the many “how to raise private equity” or “emerging growth company” seminars and events he chaired or sponsored. From its inception in late 1995 until its merger into a national law firm in 2002, Van Valkenberg Furber Law Group was involved with many of the region’s most successful start-up and emerging growth companies. Brad’s clients included Classmates Online, Digimine, Jones Soda, CallVision, Elf Technologies, VenCore Solutions and many others. He estimates that at one point he had an equity interest in more than 50 start-up and emerging growth companies. Of those, approximately a dozen have achieved some form of liquidity event, many ceased operations or liquidated assets in firesales during the dotcom bust, and some are still out there, fighting the good fight, trying to spin straw into gold.

Now, like so many attorneys, Brad has moved over to the business side. Why not? He is now getting paid to manage a business, but not expected to keep detailed records of his time billing hours to clients, recruiting and herding lawyers, and doing after hours client development. As an equity partner, he was expected to do all these things, and more. Those demands were straining Brad’s ability to spend time with his wife and kids. Those demands also did not give him as much time to exercise his creative interests and talents, in business and otherwise. On his 41st Birthday three years ago, Brad announced to the shock and surprise of many in his family that he was resigning as the executive partner of the Seattle office of a major national law firm to become the eighth employee of a small software company located in Sammamish, Washington.

For the last three years, Brad has served as President of Xeriton Corporation. Xeriton is a private company focused on bringing cutting edge consumer software and web services to market. The company now has almost thirty employees, and has achieved profitability each of the last three years. Xeriton has created a constellation of brands, including Sammsoft, ByteCrusher and Zoombli (the latter of which has in the last six months rocketed into the top 1,250 most visited Internet sites as ranked by Quantcast). Brad and his team are launching and building new brands (with associated products and services) with a view towards creating a synergistic network. To leverage its network, Xeriton has been releasing and plans to continue to roll out a number of new products and services.

Last week, the company launched a live computer support service called Zoombli LiveHelp (http://www.zoomblilivehelp.com/; toll free 1-888-660-4850). LiveHelp Experts, all of whom are certified resolution experts, are available around the clock to ensure its customers computer problems are completely resolved – satisfaction guaranteed. With permission from its customers, LiveHelp Experts connect remotely to fix up to three PCs or Macs, including hardware, software and connections to peripherals such as printers, WiFi routers and iPods. For a limited time, LiveHelp is offering one free support incident (a $50 value). For “all you can eat LiveHelp”, Zoombli is offering these services at $24.95 per month, or $199.95 for a full year. To date, 100% of LiveHelp customers surveyed have said they would recommend the service to their friends. My wife is a new customer.

This week, Xeriton is also coming out of Beta on its Web 2.0 social media website: Wiki Talk. The site offers a split screen view of top news stories and their associated comments by WikiTalk members. Right now, there is an interesting thread going around “Client 9: Her Myspace Page” (this is Ashley Alexandra Dupre, the woman that Gov. Spitzer allegedly transported from NYC to his hotel in DC). The split screen view makes it possible to view both an underlying site (e.g., the URL hosting the article, video or website) and associated WikiTalk user comments, thereby creating an easy to use framework for the WikiTalk community to engage in online discussions. WikiTalk will be partnering with a number of old media companies in the coming months to help them “extend the conversation” with their users online.

Xeriton is growing and profitable, which is not an easy feat in the startup world. Brad has learned a lot about running a successful Internet company the past three years. “We basically spend $0 on marketing campaigns that are not measured,” he says. Yet, the company has a very significant online advertising budget. As more and more marketing goes online, other executives will be as demanding as Brad on measuring the ROI on its marketing and advertising expenditures.

Ironically, Brad’s focus on online marketing has put him face-to-face with developing legal issues. “This is a rapidly growing legal field with privacy issues (around tracking visitors) and trademark issues around search,” he says. “Sometimes it is not clear who is wearing the white hat or black hat. The past few years have been a bit like the Wild West, although things are becoming clearer month by month and year by year as regulators and legislators catch up, weigh in and provide guidance and comfort on the hot and dynamic legal issues of the Internet age.” No one knows exactly how all these things will play out, but lawyers will definitely have a huge influence on the eventual outcome, which will impact and guide Brad’s business.

Brad has no regrets about leaving the law to pursue a career as a business executive. He really enjoys the creativity of his work. Also, he is coaching the basketball team for both his son, Bradley, 11, and his daughter, Isabella, 9. That would have been difficult to do had Brad continued to remain an equity partner in a major national law firm.

This brings us to how I met Brad. The boutique corporate finance and securities law firm Brad co-founded back in 1995, Van Valkenberg Furber Law Group, was hired by ARIS to serve as company counsel in connection with ARIS’ 1997 initial public offering. During some of the drafting sessions with the investment bankers, accountants, lawyers and senior business executives, ARIS CEO, Paul Song, would break up the stressful work by challenging the bankers to a basketball game. Those were spirited games and Brad won a lot of respect from Paul by pounding the boards and hitting key shots against the bankers. “Paul was very competitive and a good shooter, and we all found that it made good business sense to get the ball to Paul early and often”, Brad says with a grin.

Brad thinks one of the reasons his boutique firm won the law firm IPO bake off against a who’s who list of law firms much older and bigger was because he challenged Paul to a two-on-two basketball game for the corporate counsel IPO mandate – Paul and any ARIS executive of his choice against Brad and his fellow lawyer, Jeffrey (aka Hoopmaker) Heutmaker. Paul wouldn’t agree to the stakes, but the challenge did make an impression. Unlike most of the other deal toys now packed securely away in boxes somewhere, Brad still displays the ARIS IPO deal toy, an engraved leather basketball, on his home office shelf.

Brad recollects fondly his deal-making days as a lawyer from 1990 through 2005. That said, he says he is satisfied with his career choice to switch over to the operations side, helping to lead an emerging growth Internet company. In addition to the challenge of climbing a steep new learning curve, Brad says he values and enjoys being able to have more control over his own schedule which, in turn, enables him to spend more time with his wife of thirteen years, Sabina, and their two kids.

Read Full Post »


MEET Paul Song, a father, a world traveler and a visionary entrepreneur. Oh yeah, he’s also my brother. Paul’s been part of the Seattle business community since 1990 when he started ARIS, an IT consulting firm that listed on NASDAQ in 1997. He was 34 years-old then.

Today, he’s more fashionable, still in good shape, more outgoing, and some say he hasn’t aged a bit (maybe the reverse). What’s his secret fountain of youth? Maybe it’s hanging out with his 23-year-old son, Aaron. In fact, they started a business together in Vietnam called Met Vuong (means square meter), a real estate information company based in Ho Chi Minh City.

After graduating from Pepperdine University, Aaron asked his father to go to Asia with him to look for business opportunities. He knew that no one would otherwise take a 22-year-old seriously in that part of the world. Aaron had run a very successful internet company, PresalePassword.net, while studying at Pepperdine and knew he could continue that and peripheral ventures from anywhere in world.

Paul, at the time, was retired, and jumped at the chance of working with his son. First, they went to Shanghai in 2006. They soon discovered that Shanghai already was well on its way in economic development. “There’s enough money and people there that things were already being tried and funded,” Paul says.

As a former member of Asia-Pacific Business Advisory Council (a business advisory group for the governments of APEC), he visited Vietnam in November, 2006, and was coaxed by local business leaders to relocate there. They moved in mid-April, 2007 and had a difficult time finding appropriate housing: No central database of real estate listings; no internet listings. A-ha!

Paul knew that it would be critical to solicit influential real estate companies as partners. He not only signed up partners but allowed some of them to invest in Met Vuong, further solidifying the relationships. The coding on the site started in June with Aaron in charge of the website and its developers, while Paul worked his relationships and managed the business plan.

 

In September, the website launched with content from such partners as CB Richard Ellis and Savills, as well as a host of Vietnamese real estate companies. Next month, Met Vuong will launch its first magazine publication. Paul and Aaron believe this will be a vital component in becoming the de facto real estate information company in Vietnam. The business plan calls for both online and offline reach in the developing country.

 

So, what’s it like working with your 23-year-old son after having run a public company? Overall, it’s been great, says Paul, but “we’ve had to work out some issues.” Aaron had never worked in a corporate environment, but had become a successful entrepreneur at a very young age. So, he would challenge some business protocols, which weren’t necessarily bad, but time consuming to work out.

“Overall though, it’s been a great experience for both of us,” Paul emphasizes. For others contemplating doing the same thing, Paul advises to make sure NOT to lose perspective that family relationships are more important than the business itself. It’s easy to get too wrapped up on the business, but Paul’s main reason for moving to Vietnam was to have this experience with his son Aaron.

 

 

So Paul, ethnically Korean who grew up in the US, lives in Ho Chi Minh City with his son. They are very similar in many ways. They both have steely laser focus, extreme ambition, and a propensity for technology.

 

They also are very different. Paul’s more apt to be found at a night club in Ho Chi Minh City, while Aaron is more likely to be at home spending alone time with his finance, Aileen. Paul enjoys fine wine and designer jeans, while Aaron doesn’t drink and would rather be in shorts. Nonetheless, together this father-and-son team is making their mark – in Vietnam of all places.

Oh, so is it more difficult working with your brother or working with your son? “The son,” Paul says, “We’re way too much alike.” Right answer.

Read Full Post »

ZeroDash1 was acquired by Ascentium March 1. How did the deal happen?
The genesis of ZeroDash1 came about last May when a few of us realized that measuring the effectiveness of digital marketing campaigns was an area of tremendous potential. We quickly formed a talented team, and launched with a big party at Hotel 1000 in September. The event attracted more than 400 people as the
Northwest Internet Advertising Group (NWIAG) co-sponsored the launch.
Yet, building credibility from scratch was no easy task, and while ZeroDash1 created good buzz, finding paying customers was another matter. Regardless, we focused on building brand. Our people, in particular Anil Batra, went on the speaking circuit. As a result, ZeroDash1 even made it on Forrester’s report, “Where to get help with Web Analytics”.
By December, we realized that the fragmented nature of the Web Analytics sector gave a unique window of opportunity to some company to develop market dominance. However, ZeroDash1 didn’t have the capital and reach to do this without joining forces with a larger firm.
By January, we had a serious suitor from the Bay area. We had gone through weeks of due diligence when Ascentium contacted us. The two potential deals took their course until all parties involved realized that Ascentium was the better match.
Many people wonder how to go about selling a service company. Here are some of my takeaways:

  1. You have to have an attractive business plan. We focused on talented people in a highly desirable, up-and-coming field. We had picked the right business.
  2. With a service company, you must have a stellar reputation. Build brand and not just resumes. We continued to do this even when cash became tight.
  3. Must be able to articulate your value from the potential acquirer’s perspective. It matters little what you think of your value.
  4. Be reasonable in determining valuation. It has to be a win-win.
  5. Be open as possible from the beginning. Eventually, all truths will come out anyway.
  6. Keep liabilities to a minimum. No complex corporate structure.
  7. Don’t want it TOO much, but want it bad enough.
  8. Negotiate for the team, not just the shareholders.
  9. Realize luck is involved. Be humble.

 

Looking ahead, I’m very excited about what ZeroDash1 can do as part of Ascentium. It truly seems to be a tremendous match. And the web analytics space still remains fragmented, and ready for some market leaders to emerge. Our vision remains to become one of those leaders.

Read Full Post »

A charter school in New York city will open in 2009, promising to pay teachers $125,000 in annual salary, plus possible bonuses. No, it’s not a school for the outrageously wealthy families. In fact, the school will only use public money and charter school grants. So, what gives? The teachers will be asked to work longer days and throughout the year. They will also fill in on “other” traditionally non-teacher roles in school, such as attendance coordinators or discipline deans.
In the words of the school creator and first principal, Zeke M. Vanderhoek, “I would much rather put a phenomenal, great teacher in a field with 30 kids and nothing else than take the mediocre teacher and give them half the number of students and give them all the technology in the world.”


Now that’s thinking outside the box. Vanderhoek, a Yale graduate, put a budget together that allows for such high teachers’ salaries, meaning there will definitely be skimping elsewhere. I applaud such innovative thinking in trying to improve our education system. So, is it the teachers, or technologies and class sizes that most impact successful learning by students? I’m sure it’s a combination of all, but this “experiment” will give us a lot of answers to the correlation between teacher’s pay and effective teaching.

In the business world if people would ask me whether I’d start a company with talented people or all the technology in the world, the answer seems obvious. I would like both, but would definitely start with talented people.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers